nodes each maintain a copy of the ledger by applying transactions that have been validated by a consensus protocol, grouped into blocks that include a hash that binds each block to the preceding block. disputes. One of the most important of the platform’s differentiators is its support for pluggable consensus protocols that enable the platform to be more effectively customized to fit particular use byzantine fault tolerant consensus might be considered unnecessary and an excessive drag on performance and throughput. In situations such as that, a crash fault-tolerant (CFT) consensus protocol might be more

.jpg) ## Open source community ## Building community • Use mailing list • Drive and accept consensus • Avoid poisonous people • Play nice, share, have fun  ## Consensus and vote - Key is the idea of voting: +1, 0, -1 - Main intent: gauge developer acceptance - -1

... 97 SCTL Syntax ..... 97 3.8.6 Usage ..... 98 TODO ..... 98 Sharding ..... 98 3.9 Pluggable Architecture ..... 99 3.9.1 Background ..... 99 3.9.2 Challenges ..... 99 3.9.3 Goal .... to focus on its increment instead of a total overturn. Apache ShardingSphere begin to focus on pluggable architecture from version 5.x, features can be embedded into project flexibility. Currently, the proxy-hint-enabled to true in conf/server.yaml. #### 3.8.6 Usage TODO Sharding TODO ### 3.9 Pluggable Architecture #### 3.9.1 Background In Apache ShardingSphere, many functionality implementations

Background ..... 14 3.3.2 Challenges ..... 14 3.3.3 Goal ..... 15 3.3.4 Notice ..... 15 3.4 Pluggable Architecture ..... 15 3.4.1 Background ..... 15 3.4.2 Challenges ..... 15 3.4.3 Goal .... rather than creating a new database. The concepts at the core of the project are Link, Enhance and Pluggable. • Link: Flexible adaptation of database protocol, SQL dialect and database storage. It can quickly breaker and access limitation and analyze, QoS and observability). • Pluggable: Leveraging the micro kernel and 3 layers pluggable mode, features and database ecosystem can be embedded flexibly. Developers

nodes each maintain a copy of the ledger by applying transactions that have been validated by a consensus protocol, grouped into blocks that include a hash that bind each block to the preceding block. The handling disputes. One of the most important of the platform’s differentiators is its support for pluggable consensus protocols that enable the platform to be more effectively customized to fit particular use byzantine fault tolerant consensus might be considered unnecessary and an excessive drag on performance and throughput. In situations such as that, a crash fault-tolerant (CFT) consensus protocol might be more

nodes each maintain a copy of the ledger by applying transactions that have been validated by a consensus protocol, grouped into blocks that include a hash that bind each block to the preceding block. The handling disputes. One of the most important of the platform’s differentiators is its support for pluggable consensus protocols that enable the platform to be more effectively customized to fit particular use byzantine fault tolerant consensus might be considered unnecessary and an excessive drag on performance and throughput. In situations such as that, a crash fault-tolerant (CFT) consensus protocol might be more

nodes each maintain a copy of the ledger by applying transactions that have been validated by a consensus protocol, grouped into blocks that include a hash that binds each block to the The first and most disputes. One of the most important of the platform’s differentiators is its support for pluggable consensus protocols that enable the platform to be more effectively customized to fit particular use within a single enterprise, or operated by a trusted authority, fully byzantine fault tolerant consensus might be considered unnecessary and an excessive drag on performance and throughput. In situations

nodes each maintain a copy of the ledger by applying transactions that have been validated by a consensus protocol, grouped into blocks that include a hash that binds each block to the preceding block. disputes. One of the most important of the platform’s differentiators is its support for pluggable consensus protocols that enable the platform to be more effectively customized to fit particular use within a single enterprise, or operated by a trusted authority, fully byzantine fault tolerant consensus might be considered unnecessary and an excessive drag on performance and throughput. In situations

nodes each maintain a copy of the ledger by applying transactions that have been validated by a consensus protocol, grouped into blocks that include a hash that bind each block to the preceding block. disputes. One of the most important of the platform's differentiators is its support for pluggable consensus protocols that enable the platform to be more effectively customized to fit particular use byzantine fault tolerant consensus might be considered unnecessary and an excessive drag on performance and throughput. In situations such as that, a crash fault-tolerant (CFT) consensus protocol might be more

nodes each maintain a copy of the ledger by applying transactions that have been validated by a consensus protocol, grouped into blocks that include a hash that binds each block to the preceding block. disputes. One of the most important of the platform’s differentiators is its support for pluggable consensus protocols that enable the platform to be more effectively customized to fit particular use within a single enterprise, or operated by a trusted authority, fully byzantine fault tolerant consensus might be considered unnecessary and an excessive drag on performance and throughput. In situations