.jpg) ## Open source community ## Building community • Use mailing list • Drive and accept consensus • Avoid poisonous people • Play nice, share, have fun  ## Consensus and vote - Key is the idea of voting: +1, 0, -1 - Main intent: gauge developer acceptance - -1

## +21 ## Making Libraries Consumable for Non-C++ Developers ## AARON ROBINSON 20 21 October 24-29 ## Who am I? ### .NET Core Still at Microsoft, now on the .NET Core runtime team. • https://github nint DoTheThing(in BlubT b); Result: Windows – everything passed. Linux – everything failed. Why? # Making Libraries Consumable for Non-C++ Developers Aaron R Robinson arobins@microsoft.com https://github

## Making Games Start Fast A Story About Concurrency  ![Image](/uploads/documents/7/9/3/f/793f1544c860110a4e5decd2064a1322/p2_1 make the Direct3D 9 API thread safe. This causes significant synchronization overhead. Therefore, making the Direct3D 9 API thread safe is not recommended because performance can be degraded. ![Image]( achieved by refactoring to lock free But we already reduced from 6.8s to 1.1s ## 4 Going Asynchronous Making it a problem for the future ![Image](/uploads/documents/7/9/3/f/793f1544c860110a4e5decd2064a1322/p63_1

nodes each maintain a copy of the ledger by applying transactions that have been validated by a consensus protocol, grouped into blocks that include a hash that binds each block to the preceding block. disputes. One of the most important of the platform’s differentiators is its support for pluggable consensus protocols that enable the platform to be more effectively customized to fit particular use cases byzantine fault tolerant consensus might be considered unnecessary and an excessive drag on performance and throughput. In situations such as that, a crash fault-tolerant (CFT) consensus protocol might be more

nodes each maintain a copy of the ledger by applying transactions that have been validated by a consensus protocol, grouped into blocks that include a hash that bind each block to the preceding block. The disputes. One of the most important of the platform’s differentiators is its support for pluggable consensus protocols that enable the platform to be more effectively customized to fit particular use cases byzantine fault tolerant consensus might be considered unnecessary and an excessive drag on performance and throughput. In situations such as that, a crash fault-tolerant (CFT) consensus protocol might be more

nodes each maintain a copy of the ledger by applying transactions that have been validated by a consensus protocol, grouped into blocks that include a hash that binds each block to the preceding block. disputes. One of the most important of the platform’s differentiators is its support for pluggable consensus protocols that enable the platform to be more effectively customized to fit particular use cases within a single enterprise, or operated by a trusted authority, fully byzantine fault tolerant consensus might be considered unnecessary and an excessive drag on performance and throughput. In situations

nodes each maintain a copy of the ledger by applying transactions that have been validated by a consensus protocol, grouped into blocks that include a hash that bind each block to the preceding block. One of the most important of the platform's differentiators is its support for pluggable consensus protocols that enable the platform to be more effectively customized to fit particular use cases byzantine fault tolerant consensus might be considered unnecessary and an excessive drag on performance and throughput. In situations such as that, a crash fault-tolerant (CFT) consensus protocol might be more

nodes each maintain a copy of the ledger by applying transactions that have been validated by a consensus protocol, grouped into blocks that include a hash that bind each block to the preceding block. The disputes. One of the most important of the platform’s differentiators is its support for pluggable consensus protocols that enable the platform to be more effectively customized to fit particular use cases byzantine fault tolerant consensus might be considered unnecessary and an excessive drag on performance and throughput. In situations such as that, a crash fault-tolerant (CFT) consensus protocol might be more

not a commitment to deliver any material, code, or functionality, and should not be relied upon in making purchasing decisions. The development, release, and timing of any features or functionality described English. ## Decision Making - Consensus & Votes Consensus within community. Voting is a shortcut to move consensus forward in a timely manner. Voting is a way to record an official consensus. Minimum Minimum time to make a decision: 72 hours. ## Apache RocketMQ Community ## Mailing lists #### • users@rocketmq.apache.org: Currently: 91 subscribers (up 11 in the last 3 months) (34 emails sent in the

nodes each maintain a copy of the ledger by applying transactions that have been validated by a consensus protocol, grouped into blocks that include a hash that binds each block to the preceding block. disputes. One of the most important of the platform’s differentiators is its support for pluggable consensus protocols that enable the platform to be more effectively customized to fit particular use cases within a single enterprise, or operated by a trusted authority, fully byzantine fault tolerant consensus might be considered unnecessary and an excessive drag on performance and throughput. In situations