A Seat at the Table – IT Leadership in the Age of Agility – Part 3 By Mark Schwartz “Courage, I say, is the value most needed by Agile IT leaders.” – Mark Schwartz Last Time in Part 2 Enterprise in no sense a “final” operating capability. Quality It is difficult for IT to gain a seat at the table when IT is always failing, but on the other hand, an IT leader who is reacting to statistical noise—failures and ties.The CIO’s Place at the Table IT leadership runs the business along with the others who run the business. The seat at the table is earned by being at the table. The role of senior IT leadership

A Seat at the Table – IT Leadership in the Age of Agility By Mark Schwartz “Mark Schwartz is a rare combination: a deep thinker who has also applied lean, Agile, and DevOps principles at the highest adapt, feedback-and-vision-oriented approach because of its complexity. A Nimble Approach to The Table Agile in One Paragraph: Agile thinking simply says that we should empower small teams to inspect adopting an intelligent attitude toward risk. Quality: It is difficult for IT to gain a seat at the table when IT is always failing, but on the other hand, an IT leader who is reacting to statistical noise—failures

A Seat at the Table – IT Leadership in the Age of Agility – Part 2 By Mark Schwartz “To the talented and hard-working government employees, so resilient in the face of impediments, criticism, and abuse sort of Star Chamber—a dimly lit group of serious, hooded faces (“decision makers”) seated around a table, passing judgment on each “formal proposal” presented to them. That last piece of Hunter and Westerman’s adopting an intelligent attitude toward risk. Quality: It is difficult for IT to gain a seat at the table when IT is always failing, but on the other hand, an IT leader who is reacting to statistical noise—failures

such that similar inputs have similar representations. We will call this representation an Embedding. An embedding is a vector of features that represent aspects of an input numerically. It must fulfill the given animal. In Table 4-1 we manually assigned values for the cute and dangerous features for six animals2, and we are calling the tuple of these two features an embedding, where the two features embeddings. Animal Embedding (cute, dangerous) dog (0.85, 0.05) cat (0.95, 0.05) snake (0.01, 0.9) bear (0.5, 0.95) raccoon (0.5, 0.5) mouse (0.01, 0.2) Table 4-1: A table consisting of embeddings

§22. Methods §23. Interfaces - value boxes used to do reflection and polymorphism. §24. Type Embedding - type extension in the Go way. §25. Type-Unsafe Pointers §26. Generics - use and read composite related confusions. 5. Clarifies several ambiguities which exist in the Go specification, such as embedding rules, promoted method value evaluation, and panic/recover mechanism. 6. Makes several summary reflection through interfaces. pointers. function closures. methods. deferred function calls. type embedding. type deduction. memory safety. automatic garbage collection. great cross-platform compatibility

synchronizations. §22. Methods §23. Interfaces - value boxes used to do reflection and polymorphism. §24. Type Embedding - type extension in the Go way. §25. Type-Unsafe Pointers §26. Generics - use and read composite related confusions. 5. Clarifies several ambiguities which exist in the Go specification, such as embedding rules, promoted method value evaluation, and panic/recover mechanism. 6. Makes several summary reflection through interfaces. pointers. function closures. methods. deferred function calls. type embedding. type deduction. memory safety. automatic garbage collection. great cross-platform compatibility

§22. Methods §23. Interfaces - value boxes used to do reflection and polymorphism. §24. Type Embedding - type extension in the Go way. §25. Type-Unsafe Pointers §26. Generics - use and read composite related confusions. 5. Clarifies several ambiguities which exist in the Go specification, such as embedding rules, promoted method value evaluation, and panic/recover mechanism. 6. Makes several summary reflection through interfaces. pointers. function closures. methods. deferred function calls. type embedding. type deduction. memory safety. automatic garbage collection. great cross-platform compatibility

1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.21 1.22 1.23 1.24 1.25 1.26 1.27 Table of Contents Introduction Legal Notice Preface Project Info Messaging Concepts Architecture Graceful Server Shutdown Libaio Native Libraries Thread management Logging REST Interface Embedding Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Apache Karaf Spring Integration AeroGear Integration VertX Integration Apache ActiveMQ Artemis servers in your own application. For more information on embedding Apache ActiveMQ Artemis, see Embedding Apache ActiveMQ Artemis. Apache ActiveMQ Artemis integrated with a Java EE

1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.21 1.22 1.23 1.24 1.25 1.26 1.27 Table of Contents Introduction Legal Notice Preface Project Info Messaging Concepts Architecture Graceful Server Shutdown Libaio Native Libraries Thread management Logging REST Interface Embedding Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Apache Karaf Spring Integration AeroGear Integration VertX Integration Apache ActiveMQ Artemis servers in your own application. For more information on embedding Apache ActiveMQ Artemis, see Embedding Apache ActiveMQ Artemis. Apache ActiveMQ Artemis integrated with a Java EE

1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.21 1.22 1.23 1.24 1.25 1.26 1.27 Table of Contents Introduction Legal Notice Preface Project Info Messaging Concepts Architecture Graceful Server Shutdown Libaio Native Libraries Thread management Logging REST Interface Embedding Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Apache Karaf Spring Integration AeroGear Integration VertX Integration Apache ActiveMQ Artemis servers in your own application. For more information on embedding Apache ActiveMQ Artemis, see Embedding Apache ActiveMQ Artemis. Apache ActiveMQ Artemis integrated with a Java EE