Value awt.toolkit sun.awt.windows.WToolkit executable­war C:\Users\MarkE\Downloads\jenkins.war file.encoding Cp1252 file.encoding.pkg sun.io file.separator \ java.awt.graphicsenv sun.awt.Win32GraphicsEnvironment Win32GraphicsEnvironment java.awt.headless true java.awt.printerjob sun.awt.windows.WPrinterJob java.class.path Downloads\jenkins.war java.class.version 52.0 java.endorsed.dirs C:\Program Files\Java\jre1

in terms of components and containers, just like AWT does with desktop windows. Both frameworks share the same component-based architecture: in AWT we have a Windows instance which represents the physical

pages in terms of components and containers, just like AWT does with desktop windows. Both frameworks share the same component-based architecture: in AWT we have a Windows instance which represents the physical Component. Wicket pages can be composed (and usually are) by many components, just like AWT windows are composed by Swing/AWT components. Both frameworks promote the reuse of presentation code and GUI elements

pages in terms of components and containers, just like AWT does with desktop windows. Both frameworks share the same component-based architecture: in AWT we have a Windows instance which represents the physical Component. Wicket pages can be composed (and usually are) by many components, just like AWT windows are composed by Swing/AWT components. Both frameworks promote the reuse of presentation code and GUI elements

pages in terms of components and containers, just like AWT does with desktop windows. Both frameworks share the same component-based architecture: in AWT we have a Windows instance which represents the physical Component. Wicket pages can be composed (and usually are) by many components, just like AWT windows are composed by Swing/AWT components. Both frameworks promote the reuse of presentation code and GUI elements

pages in terms of components and containers, just like AWT does with desktop windows. Both frameworks share the same component-based architecture: in AWT we have a Windows instance which represents the physical Component. Wicket pages can be composed (and usually are) by many components, just like AWT windows are composed by Swing/AWT components. Both frameworks promote the reuse of presentation code and GUI elements

something like this: 1770 [AWT-EventQueue-0] INFO Contributors - kotlin: loaded 40 repos 2025 [AWT-EventQueue-0] INFO Contributors - kotlin-examples: loaded 23 contributors 2229 [AWT-EventQueue-0] INFO Contributors the one called loadContributorsBlocking() is from, which is the main UI thread (in Swing, it's an AWT event dispatching thread). This main thread becomes blocked, and that's why the UI is frozen: 885 you ensure that the updateResults() call, which updates the results, happens on the main UI thread (AWT event dispatching thread). However, if you try to load the contributors via the BACKGROUND option

fixed webjar stops working (SPR-12432) fixed introspection with BeanUtils started failing against java.awt.Window (SPR- 12434) fixed embedded derby database uses derby.log (SPR-12437) fixed use of the same

fixed webjar stops working (SPR-12432) fixed introspection with BeanUtils started failing against java.awt.Window (SPR- 12434) fixed embedded derby database uses derby.log (SPR-12437) fixed use of the same

fixed webjar stops working (SPR-12432) fixed introspection with BeanUtils started failing against java.awt.Window (SPR- 12434) fixed embedded derby database uses derby.log (SPR-12437) fixed use of the same