referred to as microservices, wherein a large applica�on is split into small independent services that communicate with each other via APIs using lightweight protocols like HTTP. Microservices applica�ons delivery. This shi� toward highly dynamic microservices presents both a challenge and an opportunity in terms of securing connec�vity between microservices. Tradi�onal Linux network security approaches iptables) filter on IP address and TCP/UDP ports, but IP addresses frequently churn in dynamic microservices environments. The highly vola�le life cycle of containers causes these approaches to struggle

referred to as microservices, wherein a large application is split into small independent services that communicate with each other via APIs using lightweight protocols like HTTP. Microservices applications delivery. This shift toward highly dynamic microservices presents both a challenge and an opportunity in terms of securing connectivity between microservices. Traditional Linux network security approaches iptables) filter on IP address and TCP/UDP ports, but IP addresses frequently churn in dynamic microservices environments. The highly volatile life cycle of containers causes these approaches to struggle

referred to as microservices, wherein a large application is split into small independent services that communicate with each other via APIs using lightweight protocols like HTTP. Microservices applications delivery. This shift toward highly dynamic microservices presents both a challenge and an opportunity in terms of securing connectivity between microservices. Traditional Linux network security approaches iptables) filter on IP address and TCP/UDP ports, but IP addresses frequently churn in dynamic microservices environments. The highly volatile life cycle of containers causes these approaches to struggle

referred to as microservices, wherein a large application is split into small independent services that communicate with each other via APIs using lightweight protocols like HTTP. Microservices applications delivery. This shift toward highly dynamic microservices presents both a challenge and an opportunity in terms of securing connectivity between microservices. Traditional Linux network security approaches iptables) filter on IP address and TCP/UDP ports, but IP addresses frequently churn in dynamic microservices environments. The highly volatile life cycle of containers causes these approaches to struggle

referred to as microservices, wherein a large application is split into small independent services that communicate with each other via APIs using lightweight protocols like HTTP. Microservices applications delivery. This shift toward highly dynamic microservices presents both a challenge and an opportunity in terms of securing connectivity between microservices. Traditional Linux network security approaches iptables) filter on IP address and TCP/UDP ports, but IP addresses frequently churn in dynamic microservices environments. The highly volatile life cycle of containers causes these approaches to struggle

referred to as microservices, wherein a large application is split into small independent services that communicate with each other via APIs using lightweight protocols like HTTP. Microservices applications delivery. This shift toward highly dynamic microservices presents both a challenge and an opportunity in terms of securing connectivity between microservices. Traditional Linux network security approaches iptables) filter on IP address and TCP/UDP ports, but IP addresses frequently churn in dynamic microservices environments. The highly volatile life cycle of containers causes these approaches to struggle

referred to as microservices, wherein a large application is split into small independent services that communicate with each other via APIs using lightweight protocols like HTTP. Microservices applications delivery. This shift toward highly dynamic microservices presents both a challenge and an opportunity in terms of securing connectivity between microservices. Traditional Linux network security approaches iptables) filter on IP address and TCP/UDP ports, but IP addresses frequently churn in dynamic microservices environments. The highly volatile life cycle of containers causes these approaches to struggle

is a reliable, high-performance Python web framework for building large-scale app backends and microservices. It encourages the REST architectural style, and tries to do as little as possible while remaining How is Falcon different? We designed Falcon to support the demanding needs of large-scale microservices and responsive app backends. Falcon complements more general Python web frameworks by providing

is a reliable, high-performance Python web framework for building large-scale app backends and microservices. It encourages the REST architectural style, and tries to do as little as possible while remaining How is Falcon different? We designed Falcon to support the demanding needs of large-scale microservices and responsive app backends. Falcon complements more general Python web frameworks by providing

is a reliable, high-performance Python web framework for building large-scale app backends and microservices. It encourages the REST architectural style, and tries to do as little as possible while remaining How is Falcon different? We designed Falcon to support the demanding needs of large-scale microservices and responsive app backends. Falcon complements more general Python web frameworks by providing