and b both have a numeric type for which an infix subtraction operator is defined, but the code segment a -b may give us an error message from the compiler. The reason is that in this case, the - sign performance of global code is that global variables are not located on the stack but in the global BSS segment of the program, and the backend cannot optimize global code well. For example, global variables the BSS segment instead of on the stack and so its value is preserved between procedure calls. Note that structured named constants, such as constant strings, are also stored in the BSS segment, even

and b both have a numeric type for which an infix subtraction operator is defined, but the code segment a -b may give us an error message from the compiler. The reason is that in this case, the - sign performance of global code is that global variables are not located on the stack but in the global BSS segment of the program, and the backend cannot optimize global code well. For example, global variables the BSS segment instead of on the stack and so its value is preserved between procedure calls. Note that structured named constants, such as constant strings, are also stored in the BSS segment, even

and b both have a numeric type for which an infix subtraction operator is defined, but the code segment a -b may give us an error message from the compiler. The reason is that in this case, the - sign performance of global code is that global variables are not located on the stack but in the global BSS segment of the program, and the backend cannot optimize global code well. For example, global variables the BSS segment instead of on the stack and so its value is preserved between procedure calls. Note that structured named constants, such as constant strings, are also stored in the BSS segment, even

and b both have a numeric type for which an infix subtraction operator is defined, but the code segment a -b may give us an error message 40 from the compiler. The reason is that in this case, the - performance of global code is that global variables are not located on the stack but in the global BSS segment of the program, and the backend cannot optimize global code well. For example, global variables the BSS segment instead of on the stack and so its value is pre­ served between procedure calls. Note that structured named constants, such as constant strings, are also stored in the BSS segment, even

and b both have a numeric type for which an infix subtraction operator is defined, but the code segment a -b may give us an error message from the compiler. The reason is that in this case, the - sign performance of global code is that global variables are not located on the stack but in the global BSS segment of the program, and the backend cannot optimize global code well. For example, global variables the BSS segment instead of on the stack and so its value is preserved between procedure calls. Note that structured named constants, such as constant strings, are also stored in the BSS segment, even

and b both have a numeric type for which an infix subtraction operator is defined, but the code segment a -b may give us an error message 40 from the compiler. The reason is that in this case, the - performance of global code is that global variables are not located on the stack but in the global BSS segment of the program, and the backend cannot optimize global code well. For example, global variables the BSS segment instead of on the stack and so its value is pre­ served between procedure calls. Note that structured named constants, such as constant strings, are also stored in the BSS segment, even

and b both have a numeric type for which an infix subtraction operator is defined, but the code segment a -b may give us an error message 40 from the compiler. The reason is that in this case, the - performance of global code is that global variables are not located on the stack but in the global BSS segment of the program, and the backend cannot optimize global code well. For example, global variables the BSS segment instead of on the stack and so its value is pre­ served between procedure calls. Note that structured named constants, such as constant strings, are also stored in the BSS segment, even

and b both have a numeric type for which an infix subtraction operator is defined, but the code segment a -b may give us an error message 40 from the compiler. The reason is that in this case, the - performance of global code is that global variables are not located on the stack but in the global BSS segment of the program, and the backend cannot optimize global code well. For example, global variables the BSS segment instead of on the stack and so its value is pre­ served between procedure calls. Note that structured named constants, such as constant strings, are also stored in the BSS segment, even

and b both have a numeric type for which an infix subtraction operator is defined, but the code segment a -b may give us an error message 40 from the compiler. The reason is that in this case, the - performance of global code is that global variables are not located on the stack but in the global BSS segment of the program, and the backend cannot optimize global code well. For example, global variables the BSS segment instead of on the stack and so its value is pre­ served between procedure calls. Note that structured named constants, such as constant strings, are also stored in the BSS segment, even

and b both have a numeric type for which an infix subtraction operator is defined, but the code segment a -b may give us an error message from the compiler. The reason is that in this case, the - sign performance of global code is that global variables are not located on the stack but in the global BSS segment of the program, and the backend cannot optimize global code well. For example, global variables the BSS segment instead of on the stack and so its value is preserved between procedure calls. Note that structured named constants, such as constant strings, are also stored in the BSS segment, even