the relevant changes ii. Sampling and examining pull requests from larger population or those relevant to production incidents 1. Bad pull requests – typically doesn’t have enough context for the reader changes intended outcome, or explanation of the thought process behind the change 2. Good pull requests – sufficient detail on why the change is made, how the change was made, and identified risks and

the functionality to users and other stakeholders and receives feedback. The team then adds user requests for new features to the program backlog, and places tasks that address defects and uncompleted element in attaining the benefits of Agile practices. Long contracting timelines and costly change requests have become major hurdles in executing Agile developments and enabling small, frequent releases process helps the development team to quickly and easily clarify requirements and respond to user requests, thus implementing features more likely to be accepted by the user. User acceptance of capabilities

have been part of the problem to come along Changing the Laws of Engineering with GitHub Pull Requests by Ralph Bodenner (New Relic) https://bit.ly/pull-request-your-culture  How you change your process

to distribute unemployment benefits, to regulate fish and wildlife. In 2012 they oversaw eighty requests totaling more than $400 million. And they issue standards and guidance to various agencies on

‘applications affected’ don’t even have what I need. It’s why I’ve stopped even putting in change requests.”  “I have to manually type in hundreds of server names in one of the text boxes. Most of the