nodes to a distributed ordering service. Kafka (deprecated in v2.0) Similar to Raft-based ordering, Apache Kafka is a CFT implementation that uses a “leader and follower” node configuration. Kafka utilizes ZooKeeper on their own. Likewise, support for Kafka-related issues is handled through Apache [https://kafka.apache.org/], the open-source developer of Kafka, not Hyperledger Fabric. The Fabric Raft implementation platform for use as a cluster of ordering nodes. You can read more about Kafka at the Apache Kafka Web site [https://kafka.apache.org/intro], but at a high level, Kafka uses the same conceptual “leader and follower”

nodes to a distributed ordering service. Kafka (deprecated in v2.x) Similar to Raft-based ordering, Apache Kafka is a CFT implementation that uses a “leader and follower” node configuration. Kafka utilizes ZooKeeper on their own. Likewise, support for Kafka-related issues is handled through Apache [https://kafka.apache.org/], the open-source developer of Kafka, not Hyperledger Fabric. The Fabric Raft implementation platform for use as a cluster of ordering nodes. You can read more about Kafka at the Apache Kafka Web site [https://kafka.apache.org/intro], but at a high level, Kafka uses the same conceptual “leader and follower”

nodes to a distributed ordering service. Kafka (deprecated in v2.x) Similar to Raft-based ordering, Apache Kafka is a CFT implementation that uses a “leader and follower” node configuration. Kafka utilizes ZooKeeper on their own. Likewise, support for Kafka-related issues is handled through Apache [https://kafka.apache.org/], the open-source developer of Kafka, not Hyperledger Fabric. The Fabric Raft implementation platform for use as a cluster of ordering nodes. You can read more about Kafka at the Apache Kafka Web site [https://kafka.apache.org/intro], but at a high level, Kafka uses the same conceptual “leader and follower”

nodes to a distributed ordering service. Kafka (deprecated in v2.0) Similar to Raft-based ordering, Apache Kafka is a CFT implementation that uses a “leader and follower” node configuration. Kafka utilizes ZooKeeper on their own. Likewise, support for Kafka-related issues is handled through Apache [https://kafka.apache.org/], the open-source developer of Kafka, not Hyperledger Fabric. The Fabric Raft implementation platform for use as a cluster of ordering nodes. You can read more about Kafka at the Apache Kafka Web site [https://kafka.apache.org/intro], but at a high level, Kafka uses the same conceptual “leader and follower”

nodes to a distributed ordering service. Kafka (deprecated in v2.0) Similar to Raft-based ordering, Apache Kafka is a CFT implementation that uses a “leader and follower” node configuration. Kafka utilizes ZooKeeper on their own. Likewise, support for Kafka-related issues is handled through Apache [https://kafka.apache.org/], the open-source developer of Kafka, not Hyperledger Fabric. The Fabric Raft implementation platform for use as a cluster of ordering nodes. You can read more about Kafka at the Apache Kafka Web site [https://kafka.apache.org/intro], but at a high level, Kafka uses the same conceptual “leader and follower”

to a distributed ordering service. • Kafka (deprecated in v2.0) Similar to Raft-based ordering, Apache Kafka is a CFT implementation that uses a “leader and follower” node configuration. Kafka utilizes use Kafka and ZooKeeper on their own. Likewise, support for Kafka-related issues is handled through Apache, the open-source developer of Kafka, not Hyperledger Fabric. The Fabric Raft implementation, on the distributed streaming platform for use as a cluster of ordering nodes. You can read more about Kafka at the Apache Kafka Web site, but at a high level, Kafka uses the same conceptual “leader and follower” configuration

nodes to a distributed ordering service. Kafka (deprecated in v2.0) Similar to Raft-based ordering, Apache Kafka is a CFT implementation that uses a “leader and follower” node configuration. Kafka utilizes ZooKeeper on their own. Likewise, support for Kafka-related issues is handled through Apache [https://kafka.apache.org/], the open-source developer of Kafka, not Hyperledger Fabric. The Fabric Raft implementation platform for use as a cluster of ordering nodes. You can read more about Kafka at the Apache Kafka Web site [https://kafka.apache.org/intro], but at a high level, Kafka uses the same conceptual “leader and follower”

to a distributed ordering service. • Kafka (deprecated in v2.x) Similar to Raft-based ordering, Apache Kafka is a CFT implementation that uses a “leader and follower” node configuration. Kafka utilizes use Kafka and ZooKeeper on their own. Likewise, support for Kafka-related issues is handled through Apache, the open-source developer of Kafka, not Hyperledger Fabric. The Fabric Raft implementation, on the distributed streaming platform for use as a cluster of ordering nodes. You can read more about Kafka at the Apache Kafka Web site, but at a high level, Kafka uses the same conceptual “leader and follower” configuration

to a distributed ordering service. • Kafka (deprecated in v2.0) Similar to Raft-based ordering, Apache Kafka is a CFT implementation that uses a “leader and follower” node configuration. Kafka utilizes use Kafka and ZooKeeper on their own. Likewise, support for Kafka-related issues is handled through Apache, the open-source developer of Kafka, not Hyperledger Fabric. The Fabric Raft implementation, on the distributed streaming platform for use as a cluster of ordering nodes. You can read more about Kafka at the Apache Kafka Web site, but at a high level, Kafka uses the same conceptual “leader and follower” configuration

to a distributed ordering service. • Kafka (deprecated in v2.0) Similar to Raft-based ordering, Apache Kafka is a CFT implementation that uses a “leader and follower” node configuration. Kafka utilizes use Kafka and ZooKeeper on their own. Likewise, support for Kafka-related issues is handled through Apache, the open-source developer of Kafka, not Hyperledger Fabric. The Fabric Raft implementation, on the distributed streaming platform for use as a cluster of ordering nodes. You can read more about Kafka at the Apache Kafka Web site, but at a high level, Kafka uses the same conceptual “leader and follower” configuration