writing a high-quality API based on Falcon requires that: 1. Resource responders set response variables to sane values. 2. Untrusted input (i.e., input from an external client or service) is validated I manage my database connections? – What is the recommended approach for making configuration variables available to multiple resource classes? – How do I test my Falcon app? Can I use pytest? Design writing a high-quality API based on Falcon requires that: 1. Resource responders set response variables to sane values. 2. Your code is well-tested, with high code coverage. 3. Errors are anticipated

writing a high-quality API based on Falcon requires that: 1. Resource responders set response variables to sane values. 2. Untrusted input (i.e., input from an external client or service) is validated do I manage my database connections? What is the recommended approach for making configuration variables available to multiple resource classes? How do I test my Falcon app? Can I use pytest? Design Philosophy writing a high- quality API based on Falcon requires that: 1. Resource responders set response variables to sane values. 2. Your code is well-tested, with high code coverage. 3. Errors are anticipated

all requests. Therefore, as long as you are careful about the way responders access class member variables to avoid conflicts, your WSGI app should be thread-safe. That being said, Falcon-based services writing a high-quality API based on Falcon requires that: 1. Resource responders set response variables to sane values. 2. Your code is well-tested, with high code coverage. 3. Errors are anticipated framework, it’s pretty obvious which inputs lead to which outputs. Also, it’s blatantly obvious where variables originate. All this makes it easier to reason about the code and to debug edge cases in large-scale

all requests. Therefore, as long as you are careful about the way responders access class member variables to avoid conflicts, your WSGI app should be thread-safe. That being said, Falcon-based services writing a high-quality API based on Falcon requires that: 1. Resource responders set response variables to sane values. 2. Your code is well-tested, with high code coverage. 3. Errors are anticipated framework, it’s pretty obvious which inputs lead to which outputs. Also, it’s blatantly obvious where variables originate. All this makes it easier to reason about the code and to debug edge cases in large-scale

all requests. Therefore, as long as you are careful about the way responders access class member variables to avoid conflicts, your WSGI app should be thread-safe. That being said, Falcon-based services writing a high-quality API based on Falcon requires that: 1. Resource responders set response variables to sane values. 2. Your code is well-tested, with high code coverage. 3. Errors are anticipated framework, it’s pretty obvious which inputs lead to which outputs. Also, it’s blatantly obvious where variables originate. All this makes it easier to reason about the code and to debug edge cases in large-scale

all requests. Therefore, as long as you are careful about the way responders access class member variables to avoid conflicts, your WSGI app should be thread-safe. That being said, Falcon-based services writing a high-quality API based on Falcon requires that: 1. Resource responders set response variables to sane values. 2. Your code is well-tested, with high code coverage. 3. Errors are anticipated framework, it’s pretty obvious which inputs lead to which outputs. Also, it’s blatantly obvious where variables originate. All this makes it easier to reason about the code and to debug edge cases in large-scale

all requests. Therefore, as long as you are careful about the way responders access class member variables to avoid conflicts, your WSGI app should be thread-safe. That being said, Falcon-based services writing a high-quality API based on Falcon requires that: 1. Resource responders set response variables to sane values. 2. Your code is well-tested, with high code coverage. 3. Errors are anticipated framework, it’s pretty obvious which inputs lead to which outputs. Also, it’s blatantly obvious where variables originate. All this makes it easier to reason about the code and to debug edge cases in large-scale

writing a high-quality API based on Falcon requires that: 1. Resource responders set response variables to sane values. 2. Untrusted input (i.e., input from an external client or service) is validated I manage my database connections? – What is the recommended approach for making configuration variables available to multiple resource classes? – How do I test my Falcon app? Can I use pytest? Design writing a high-quality API based on Falcon requires that: 1. Resource responders set response variables to sane values. 2. Your code is well-tested, with high code coverage. 5.1. User Guide 41 Falcon

all requests. Therefore, as long as you are careful about the way responders access class member variables to avoid conflicts, your WSGI app should be thread-safe. That being said, Falcon-based services writing a high-quality API based on Falcon requires that: 1. Resource responders set response variables to sane values. 2. Your code is well-tested, with high code coverage. 3. Errors are anticipated framework, it’s pretty obvious which inputs lead to which outputs. Also, it’s blatantly obvious where variables originate. All this makes it easier to reason about the code and to debug edge cases in large-scale

writing a high-quality API based on Falcon requires that: 1. Resource responders set response variables to sane values. 2. Untrusted input (i.e., input from an external client or service) is validated I manage my database connections? – What is the recommended approach for making configuration variables available to multiple resource classes? – How do I test my Falcon app? Can I use pytest? Design writing a high-quality API based on Falcon requires that: 1. Resource responders set response variables to sane values. 2. Your code is well-tested, with high code coverage. 5.1. User Guide 41 Falcon