Native asyncio support • No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management • Stable interfaces with an emphasis on backwards-compatibility • Simple API modeling through centralized RESTful Native asyncio support • No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management • Stable interfaces with an emphasis on backwards-compatibility • Simple API modeling through centralized RESTful start as opposed to lower-level unit testing, since it is difficult to anticipate what internal interfaces and components are needed in advance of defining the application’s user-facing functionality.

Native asyncio support • No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management • Stable interfaces with an emphasis on backwards-compatibility • Simple API modeling through centralized RESTful Native asyncio support • No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management • Stable interfaces with an emphasis on backwards-compatibility • Simple API modeling through centralized RESTful start as opposed to lower-level unit testing, since it is difficult to anticipate what internal interfaces and components are needed in advance of defining the application’s user-facing functionality.

Native asyncio support • No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management • Stable interfaces with an emphasis on backwards-compatibility • Simple API modeling through centralized RESTful Native asyncio support • No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management • Stable interfaces with an emphasis on backwards-compatibility • Simple API modeling through centralized RESTful start as opposed to lower-level unit testing, since it is difficult to anticipate what internal interfaces and components are needed in advance of defining the application’s user-facing functionality.

Native asyncio support • No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management • Stable interfaces with an emphasis on backwards-compatibility • Simple API modeling through centralized RESTful Native asyncio support • No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management • Stable interfaces with an emphasis on backwards-compatibility • Simple API modeling through centralized RESTful start as opposed to lower-level unit testing, since it is difficult to anticipate what internal interfaces and components are needed in advance of defining the application’s user-facing functionality.

Native asyncio support • No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management • Stable interfaces with an emphasis on backwards-compatibility • Simple API modeling through centralized RESTful Native asyncio support • No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management • Stable interfaces with an emphasis on backwards-compatibility • Simple API modeling through centralized RESTful start as opposed to lower-level unit testing, since it is difficult to anticipate what internal interfaces and components are needed in advance of defining the application’s user-facing functionality.

Native asyncio support • No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management • Stable interfaces with an emphasis on backwards-compatibility • Simple API modeling through centralized RESTful Native asyncio support • No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management • Stable interfaces with an emphasis on backwards-compatibility • Simple API modeling through centralized RESTful start as opposed to lower-level unit testing, since it is difficult to anticipate what internal interfaces and components are needed in advance of defining the application’s user-facing functionality.

Native asyncio support • No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management • Stable interfaces with an emphasis on backwards-compatibility • Simple API modeling through centralized RESTful Native asyncio support • No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management • Stable interfaces with an emphasis on backwards-compatibility • Simple API modeling through centralized RESTful start as opposed to lower-level unit testing, since it is difficult to anticipate what internal interfaces and components are needed in advance of defining the application’s user-facing functionality.

Native asyncio support • No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management • Stable interfaces with an emphasis on backwards-compatibility • Simple API modeling through centralized RESTful Native asyncio support • No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management • Stable interfaces with an emphasis on backwards-compatibility • Simple API modeling through centralized RESTful start as opposed to lower-level unit testing, since it is difficult to anticipate what internal interfaces and components are needed in advance of defining the application’s user-facing functionality.

support Native asyncio support No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management Stable interfaces with an emphasis on backwards-compatibility Simple API modeling through centralized RESTful routing support Native asyncio support No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management Stable interfaces with an emphasis on backwards-compatibility Simple API modeling through centralized RESTful routing start as opposed to lower-level unit testing, since it is difficult to anticipate what internal interfaces and components are needed in advance of defining the application’s user-facing functionality.

support Native asyncio support No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management Stable interfaces with an emphasis on backwards-compatibility Simple API modeling through centralized RESTful routing support Native asyncio support No reliance on magic globals for routing and state management Stable interfaces with an emphasis on backwards-compatibility Simple API modeling through centralized RESTful routing start as opposed to lower-level unit testing, since it is difficult to anticipate what internal interfaces and components are needed in advance of defining the application’s user-facing functionality.