. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181 16 Modules 183 16.1 Namespace management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184 Qualified names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 338 30.5 Memory Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339 Updating fields dynamic languages as being "typeless", they are definitely not: every object, whether primitive or user-defined, has a type. The lack of type declarations in most dynamic languages, however, means that

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181 16 Modules 183 16.1 Namespace management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184 Qualified names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 338 30.5 Memory Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339 Updating fields dynamic languages as being "typeless", they are definitely not: every object, whether primitive or user-defined, has a type. The lack of type declarations in most dynamic languages, however, means that

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183 16 Modules 185 16.1 Namespace management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186 Qualified names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340 30.5 Memory Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341 Updating fields dynamic languages as being "typeless", they are definitely not: every object, whether primitive or user-defined, has a type. The lack of type declarations in most dynamic languages, however, means that

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181 16 Modules 183 16.1 Namespace management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184 Qualified names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 338 30.5 Memory Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339 Updating fields dynamic languages as being "typeless", they are definitely not: every object, whether primitive or user-defined, has a type. The lack of type declarations in most dynamic languages, however, means that

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213 17 Modules 218 17.1 Namespace management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219 17.2 Submodules and relative Julia Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 408 31.5 Memory Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 409 31.6 Working with Arrays inference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 459 35.4 Memory management and arrays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 474 35.5 Execution latency, package

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169 16 Modules 174 16.1 Namespace management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175 16.2 Submodules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 324 30.5 Memory Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325 30.6 Working dynamic languages as being "typeless", they are definitely not: every object, whether primitive or user-defined, has a type. The lack of type declarations in most dynamic languages, however, means that

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169 16 Modules 174 16.1 Namespace management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175 16.2 Submodules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 324 30.5 Memory Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325 30.6 Working dynamic languages as being "typeless", they are definitely not: every object, whether primitive or user-defined, has a type. The lack of type declarations in most dynamic languages, however, means that

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169 16 Modules 174 16.1 Namespace management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175 16.2 Submodules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 324 30.5 Memory Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325 30.6 Working dynamic languages as being "typeless", they are definitely not: every object, whether primitive or user-defined, has a type. The lack of type declarations in most dynamic languages, however, means that

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169 16 Modules 174 16.1 Namespace management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175 16.2 Submodules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 324 30.5 Memory Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325 30.6 Working dynamic languages as being "typeless", they are definitely not: every object, whether primitive or user-defined, has a type. The lack of type declarations in most dynamic languages, however, means that

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169 16 Modules 174 16.1 Namespace management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175 16.2 Submodules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 324 30.5 Memory Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325 30.6 Working dynamic languages as being "typeless", they are definitely not: every object, whether primitive or user-defined, has a type. The lack of type declarations in most dynamic languages, however, means that