November 2009 are insecure when using SSL renegotiation, due to a vulnerability in the SSL protocol. As a stop-gap fix for this vulnerability, some vendors shipped SSL libraries incapable of doing renegotiation umserver = S.oid); 3. Do not forget to include the template0 and template1 databases, or the vulnerability will still exist in databases you create later. To fix template0, you’ll need to temporarily make connections only from the OS user who launched the test suite. This closes on Windows the same vulnerability previously closed on other platforms, namely that other users might be able to connect to the

November 2009 are insecure when using SSL renegotiation, due to a vulnerability in the SSL protocol. As a stop-gap fix for this vulnerability, some vendors shipped SSL libraries incapable of doing renegotiation umserver = S.oid); 3. Do not forget to include the template0 and template1 databases, or the vulnerability will still exist in databases you create later. To fix template0, you’ll need to temporarily make connections only from the OS user who launched the test suite. This closes on Windows the same vulnerability previously closed on other platforms, namely that other users might be able to connect to the

November 2009 are insecure when using SSL renegotiation, due to a vulnerability in the SSL protocol. As a stop-gap fix for this vulnerability, some vendors also shipped SSL libraries incapable of doing renegotiation release notes for 7.4.11. E.89.2. Changes • Remove security vulnerability that allowed connected users to read backend memory (Tom) The vulnerability involves suppressing the normal check that a SQL function notes for 7.3.13. E.109.2. Changes • Remove security vulnerability that allowed connected users to read backend memory (Tom) The vulnerability involves changing the data type of a table column used

November 2009 are insecure when using SSL renegotiation, due to a vulnerability in the SSL protocol. As a stop-gap fix for this vulnerability, some vendors shipped SSL libraries incapable of doing renegotiation umserver = S.oid); 3. Do not forget to include the template0 and template1 databases, or the vulnerability will still exist in databases you create later. To fix template0, you’ll need to temporarily make connections only from the OS user who launched the test suite. This closes on Windows the same vulnerability previously closed on other platforms, namely that other users might be able to connect to the

November 2009 are insecure when using SSL renegotiation, due to a vulnerability in the SSL protocol. As a stop-gap fix for this vulnerability, some vendors shipped SSL libraries incapable of doing renegotiation umserver = S.oid); 3. Do not forget to include the template0 and template1 databases, or the vulnerability will still exist in databases you create later. To fix template0, you’ll need to temporarily make connections only from the OS user who launched the test suite. This closes on Windows the same vulnerability previously closed on other platforms, namely that other users might be able to connect to the

November 2009 are insecure when using SSL renegotiation, due to a vulnerability in the SSL protocol. As a stop-gap fix for this vulnerability, some vendors also shipped SSL libraries incapable of doing renegotiation notes for 7.4.11. E.114.2. Changes • Remove security vulnerability that allowed connected users to read backend memory (Tom) The vulnerability involves suppressing the normal check that a SQL function notes for 7.3.13. E.134.2. Changes • Remove security vulnerability that allowed connected users to read backend memory (Tom) The vulnerability involves changing the data type of a table column used

November 2009 are insecure when using SSL renegotiation, due to a vulnerability in the SSL protocol. As a stop-gap fix for this vulnerability, some vendors also shipped SSL libraries incapable of doing renegotiation notes for 7.4.11. E.114.2. Changes • Remove security vulnerability that allowed connected users to read backend memory (Tom) The vulnerability involves suppressing the normal check that a SQL function notes for 7.3.13. E.134.2. Changes • Remove security vulnerability that allowed connected users to read backend memory (Tom) The vulnerability involves changing the data type of a table column used

November 2009 are insecure when using SSL renegotiation, due to a vulnerability in the SSL protocol. As a stop-gap fix for this vulnerability, some vendors shipped SSL libraries incapable of doing renegotiation connections only from the OS user who launched the test suite. This closes on Windows the same vulnerability previously closed on other platforms, namely that other users might be able to connect to the connections only from the OS user who launched the test suite. This closes on Windows the same vulnerability previously closed on other platforms, namely that other users might be able to connect to the

November 2009 are insecure when using SSL renegotiation, due to a vulnerability in the SSL protocol. As a stop-gap fix for this vulnerability, some vendors shipped SSL libraries incapable of doing renegotiation connections only from the OS user who launched the test suite. This closes on Windows the same vulnerability previously closed on other platforms, namely that other users might be able to connect to the connections only from the OS user who launched the test suite. This closes on Windows the same vulnerability previously closed on other platforms, namely that other users might be able to connect to the

release notes for 7.4.11. E.32.2. Changes • Remove security vulnerability that allowed connected users to read backend memory (Tom) The vulnerability involves suppressing the normal check that a SQL function release notes for 7.3.13. E.52.2. Changes • Remove security vulnerability that allowed connected users to read backend memory (Tom) The vulnerability involves changing the data type of a table column used