in a non-invasive way, without touching the target components source code and that, in terms of tooling, all configuration styles are supported by the Spring Tools for Eclipse. An alternative to XML setup explicit in the code, and this may be just fine. Remember that the Spring Tools for Eclipse provides tooling that can render graphs showing how everything is wired, which may be all you need. Also, your Java ServiceConfig is loosely coupled with respect to the concrete DefaultRepositoryConfig, and built-in IDE tooling is still useful: You can easily get a type hierarchy of RepositoryConfig implementations. In this

its type-system, the Spring Framework provides null-safety of the whole Spring Framework API via tooling-friendly annotations declared in the org.springframework.lang package. By default, types from Java

its type-system, the Spring Framework provides null-safety of the whole Spring Framework API via tooling-friendly annotations declared in the org.springframework.lang package. By default, types from Java

bean) * fixed ConfigBeanDefinitionParser to properly handle empty pointcut/advice bean names in a tooling environment Package org.springframework.beans * CustomBooleanEditor trims text before comparing

bean) * fixed ConfigBeanDefinitionParser to properly handle empty pointcut/advice bean names in a tooling environment Package org.springframework.beans * CustomBooleanEditor trims text before comparing

bean) * fixed ConfigBeanDefinitionParser to properly handle empty pointcut/advice bean names in a tooling environment Package org.springframework.beans * CustomBooleanEditor trims text before comparing

bean) * fixed ConfigBeanDefinitionParser to properly handle empty pointcut/advice bean names in a tooling environment * added "getAspectClassLoader()" method to AspectInstanceFactory interface * revised

bean) * fixed ConfigBeanDefinitionParser to properly handle empty pointcut/advice bean names in a tooling environment * added "getAspectClassLoader()" method to AspectInstanceFactory interface * revised

used in a non-invasive way, without touching the target components source code and that in terms of tooling, all configuration styles are supported by the Spring Tool Suite. An alternative to XML setups is not explicit in the code, and this may be just fine. Remember that the Spring Tool Suite provides tooling that can render graphs showing how everything is wired up - that may be all you need. Also, your ServiceConfig is loosely coupled with respect to the concrete DefaultRepositoryConfig, and built-in IDE tooling is still useful: it will be easy for the developer to get a type hierarchy of RepositoryConfig implementations

used in a non-invasive way, without touching the target components source code and that in terms of tooling, all configuration styles are supported by the Spring Tool Suite. An alternative to XML setups is not explicit in the code, and this may be just fine. Remember that the Spring Tool Suite provides tooling that can render graphs showing how everything is wired up - that may be all you need. Also, your ServiceConfig is loosely coupled with respect to the concrete DefaultRepositoryConfig, and built-in IDE tooling is still useful: it will be easy for the developer to get a type hierarchy of RepositoryConfig implementations